Coalition for Voting Integrity, the home of the Voice of the Voters

Summary
Home
SaveOurVote.com
Voice of the Voters! Internet/Radio
Voting News
Banfield v. Cortés
2009 Holt Bill
Editorials
Letters
Videos
Voting Machine Allocation
Reports
*GAO Reports*
Take Action!
Legislative Efforts
Voting Principles
Vision and Principles
Pollwatching Kit
Facts & FAQs
Rebuttal re Danaher
Danaher Reexamination Request
Redistricting
Blogs, Groups
Cost Comparisons
2008 Municipal Resolutions
2005 Municipal Resolutions
Lou Dobbs
Slideshow
Lehigh and Northampton Counties
Facts about HAVA
Vote-PAD
New York Times
Join Us!
Contact Us
Contact Your PA Legislators
Donate
Links
Supportive Candidates
Songs
Voting Forum October 2005
Voting Integrity Forum, June 2005
 

Voice of the Voters

January 21, 2009

Summary

 

The Voice of the Voters broadcast of January 21, 2009, was titled "Tipping Points 2009." The discussion revealed that transparency and observability remain the goals that the Election Integrity community identify as of paramount importance.

 

To get to that conclusion, guests Joseph Hall of the Berkley School of Information and Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy, Pamela Smith of Verified Voting, and John Bonifaz of Voter Action shared their unique understanding of how transparency and observability should be accomplished.

 

Program host Lori Rosolowsky opened the discussion that found Joe Hall providing an overview of "online voting," and the Department of Defense desiring online voting for overseas troops. He also discussed "next-generation" voting machines, and how voting machine vendors are shifting their marketing program to include preemptive interaction not only with election officials, but also with EI activists.

 

John Bonifaz asked questions of both Pam Smith and Joe Hall and the three engaged in a dialogue about watching congressional behavior, and the "security" of online voting.

 

John also responded to the email question, "Do the panelists believe that Microsoft has influenced, through payola or coercion, the election integrity movement?" posed by Brent Turner of the partisan Election Reform Activists for Obama. The question directly tied in with the earlier revelation that the vendors were adapting their marketing approach by interacting with the EI grassroots.

 

When asked by co-host Jim Strait if any of the new next-generation voting mechanisms conformed with the guiding-star requirement of transparency, the considered response was no.

 

A caller to the broadcast, Dan Axelrod from California, asked about federal legislation requiring paper ballots to be the ballots of record, also posed a pivotal observation and concern when he revealed that he feared "the difficulty of getting disparate Election Integrity organizations on the same page." (The author shares that fear.)

 

Pamela Smith spoke about her comfort with any process that possessed good procedures, along with transparency, observability, verifiability, chain of custody, etc.

 

John Bonifaz closed the program by sharing the information that Voter Action's near-term priorities were to keep court actions center-stage and maintain a watchful eye on Congress.

 

During the program there were two brief fundraising pleas made by Jim Strait.

 

You can listen to it all at http://voiceofthevotersarchive.org/VV012109.mp3 

 

James Strait