text of H.R. 2894, Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2009.
March 18, 2009, draft of Rep. Holt's Voter Confidence and
Increased Accessibility Act of 2009: http://coalitionforvotingintegrity.com/holt2009.pdf
Brad Friedman / The Brad Blog, July 15, 2009: "New York Times fails to correct election bill endorsement; but Rep. Holt does so . . . sort of."
Nancy Tobi of Election Defense Alliance and Democracy for New Hampshire, interviewed by Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews.com:
July 12, 2009: "Exclusive Interview with Democracy Warrior, Nancy Tobi, Part 1."
July 15, 2009: "Nancy Tobi Spells Out Exactly Why Holt Bill Is Bad News for Democracy."
July 18, 2009: "The Cult of Holt and More from Nancy Tobi."
Brad Friedman / The Brad Blog, July 1, 2009: "New York Times, Rep. Holt still misrepresenting contents of controversial election reform bill: A week later,
the 'paper of record' fails to correct egregious 'paper ballots' error in endorsement editorial. Democratic Congressman's
own website touts endorsement, repeats same fictitious information about bill...."
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org, June 24, 2009: "Voting Rights Groups Oppose New Holt Bill." [Post includes] "the editorials from Black Box Voting, Open
Voting Consortium, VotersUnite.org, and Nancy Tobi of Election Defense
Alliance and Democracy for New Hampshire opposing and rebutting the latest incarnation of Holt's perpetually flawed
proposal for election reform, currently known as "The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2009 (HR 2894) .
Brad Friedman / The Brad Blog, June 23, 2009: "New York Times Wrong Again on 'E-Voting': Editorial Endorsing Rep. Holt's Election Bill Misleads, Gets Facts Wrong. The
New York Times just doesn't get it. You'd think, by now, they
would. But they don't. And they should print a correction immediately. In a brief, unbylined editorial yesterday [June 21],
headlined 'How to Trust Electronic Voting,' the paper endorses this year's version of Rep. Rush Holt's election reform bill. The editorial is misleading and, even
worse, blatantly (and inexcusably) inaccurate on at least one important point . . ."
June 17, 2009, press release: "Holt reintroduces Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act: Bill would require voter-verified paper ballot and random audits. . . ."
Verified Voting, June 17, 2009: "VerifiedVoting.org strongly supports this long-overdue measure to provide accessible and verifiable
elections for federal office."
Voter Action, May 29, 2009: "Voter Action strongly endorses the Holt
Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, soon to be introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative
Rush Holt (D-NJ). This bill will create a federal mandate for verifiable and accessible voting systems in federal elections
with paper ballots marked by voters by hand or through the use of non-tabulating ballot marking devices. It will ensure that
voters in every precinct across the United States are guaranteed the right in a federal election to cast their votes using
paper ballots. It will require election audits for every federal election where the winning candidate receives less than 80
percent of the vote."
Brad Friedman / The Brad Blog, March 31, 2009: "Holt's election reform bill edges away from disastrousness prior to introduction: 'Final' draft for introduction,
committee process sees important improvement following criticism from Brad Blog last month; but substantive concerns still
remain: a review of the good, the bad and the still ugly . . ."
Nancy Tobi of Democracy for New Hampshire and the NH Fair Elections
Committee writes at opednews.com: "2009 Holt bill. E-voting: Making a bad system worse."
Paul Lehto writes at the PDA blog, http://blog.pdamerica.org/2009/03/holt-bill-yes-or-no/: "I’m an independent election law scholar and former election law
attorney. On all the major reform “promises” of the Holt bill, I’ve 'been there – done that,' –
and it’s nothing to be happy about or to work to nationalize as a model." [continued>>]
Progressive Democrats of America held a "Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections Conference call/debate/discussion" on the Holt bill on March 24, 2009, with John Bonifaz of Voter Action in favor and Brad Friedman, BradBlog.com, opposed. Hear the audio at http://blog.pdamerica.org/2009/03/iot-fair-and-transparent-elections-call/. Read the notes at http://pdamerica.org/misc/clean-fair-elections-3-24-09.pdf.
and John Gideon of Voters Unite have withdrawn their support. See http://www.votersunite.org/info/2009HoltBillTimeline.pdf.
See Brad Friedman's coverage of the new Holt "Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act" at http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6932: "New Version of Holt's Election Reform Bill Would Institutionalize Touch-Screen Voting, Secret Software. Bill 'improved' to require paper ballots, but they may be marked or printed by computer devices which offer most of the
same dangers as current Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) devices... Additional concerns remain in the previously-defeated, newly-rewritten
draft version of the landmark legislation..."
Rebecca Mercuri amplifies Brad Friedman's concerns about the new bill with these sentiments: "The lofty promises of paper ballots,
recountable by hand, etc., would be irrevocably undermined by the fact that this bill, if enacted, would provide the FIRST
FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO ALLOW FOR TRADE SECRECY in the systems that collect and count votes in US elections. Certainly, manufacturers
of election equipment deserve protection of their intellectual property, and this already can be secured via copyrights and
patents. But trade secrecy is antithetic to transparency, which is an essential part of the democratic process. DON'T LET
YOURSELF BE FOOLED -- paper ballots and manual recounts can, have, and will be mandated WITHOUT the need for nondisclosure
agreements and trade secrecy."
Dr. Mercuri was
a guest on Voice of the Voters on March 7, 2007. In March 2009, Dr. Mercuri stated that her 2007 remarks still apply. A transcript of the interview
is posted at http://voiceofthevotersarchive.org/mercuri7mar07.pdf.
of BlackBoxVoting.org via http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6943: "New Holt Election Reform Bill Would Allow 'Surreptitious Dismantling of Self-Government'
Election Integrity expert
Bev Harris compares 'secret software' provisions, 'persistent' e-voting proposals to process that allowed for 'Corporate Personhood'..."